An excellent roundtable discussion re:
The proponents of SB 117 say it is meant to increase competition among video providers, provide choice to and protect consumers. In fact, it would achieve none of these goals. Instead, it would enable discriminatory deployment, eliminate consumer protections, and strip Ohio municipalities of their important role in the local video franchise process…
Listen here then contact your state rep.
3 responses so far ↓
1 Say NO to Ohio Senate Bill 117 » wenBLOG // Apr 20, 2007 at 12:49 pm
[...] I just finished a Meet the Bloggers session discussing Ohio Senate Bill 117. You’ve probably heard some radio ads spouting about how good this measure will be in promoting competition and and keeping the cost of your cable TV down. [...]
2 MB Updates // Apr 21, 2007 at 10:59 am
Meet the Bloggers Podcast features SB 117 Opponents…
Meet the Bloggers Podcast features SB 117 Opponents
The proponents of SB 117 say it is meant to increase competition among video providers, provide choice to and protect consumers. In fact, it would achieve none of these goals. Instead, it would ena…
3 kersker, linda // Apr 26, 2007 at 12:49 pm
I am a member of the Akron Board of Education. We use our public access chanel for many educational programs every day and it will be a great loss to the community and our over 24,000 students to lose our public access time. Please vote against SB117.
Linda B. Kersker